Whether temperaments
can be divided into a list
of contrasting categories such as male or female
or
can be divided into a list
of contrasting categories such as male or female
or
introvert or extrovert,
scientific or artistic,
people person or loner,
aggressive or passive,
lucky or unlucky,
conservative or liberal,
optimist or pessimist,
but clearly married or single, dead or alive
even if all the types don't reside in neatly separated boxes.
Another divide exists between the straightforward realists where others are dreaming lives closer to fiction preferring to go here and there eventually getting somewhere:
Of course there are materialists vs spiritually-mindedgoal-oriented versus process-oriented.
and how to discuss the same truths with both in the same conversation,
but if you give them a comfortable seat and a good view on the journey they might both come along
for the ride.
Same journey, two ways of arriving, and not so different where the quixotic, improvisational, and inefficient can be considered another version of practical because there are no straight lines in Nature, while logical and straightforward is a kind of reverie with open eyes since straight lines are surely the most fictional plot device.
So then a no-nonsense well-planned itinerary, or get there when we get there and skip the GPS co-ordinates. Their combination isn't out of order but the two approaches would have to be hammered into a workable unity ideally coalescing somewhere
down the road at a roadie Internet cafe
with short stools
but very hot coffee.
down the road at a roadie Internet cafe
with short stools
but very hot coffee.